This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Related taskforces:
/
This redirect is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
I see no reason to have a separate article on every Mountain Dew clone. Most store brand products are not notable enough to make a full encyclopedia article about. Instead, I propose that Mountain Dew be expanded with a section about generic alternatives, or else that a separate generic Mountain Dew-like sodas article be created (preferably with a better name than my suggestion). Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 20:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
agree well put.
Agree Mountain Lighting probably does not warrant its own article. Your proposition to merge is better than the one to create an article separate for Mountain Dew clones, however. VarunRajendran(UTC)
Aggregrate generics to generic citrus sodas. Big-name brands (Mt. Dew, Mello Yello, etc.) should have their own articles, but the "other guys" can be consolidated. A section for generic alternatives is not acceptable, as the generics are alternative to each and every other major brand, and we don't want to have this info duplicated in multiple articles. ⇔ ChristTrekker20:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
