Talk:Mountain Equipment Company
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mountain Equipment Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lack of neutrality
[edit]The lack of neutrality in this article is really obvious and looks really bad.
It completely ignores the fact that the company was pretty much mismanaged to get it to the point of sale, and didn't need to get sold to fix it's problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.38.108 (talk)
- Have you looked the predecessor article at Mountain Equipment Co-op? We would be happy to add information about the management of MEC prior to the asset sale to the Mountain Equipment Co-op article, but we need reliable sources that describe the problem. Do you have any? - Ahunt (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles