Jump to content

Talk:Mount Osmond, South Australia/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

  • There are two dead links in the References section.[1]
  • Each online source cited should have a last date accessed, as the link given in the References has. Notes and References should be formatted consistently.
  • "... C.W. Lloyd, sold 200 acres around the golf course ...". Elsewhere the article uses metric measurements. Should use either metric or imperial consistently, preferably with conversions from one to the other.
  • "A somewhat "ring" of reserves exist on the slopes ...". Don't understand what a "somewhat ring" is supposed to be.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I should be able to fix those tonight - Waterfall Gully and Mount Osmond share the same census stats, so residents will be mostly a case of rewording the Waterfall Gully text to highlight Mount Osmond in the residents section. Politics is relatively simple, and the other two I should be good with the sources I have. Luck holding I'll have something properly sourced by tomorrow. :) (Plus I just finished taking my last class for the semester, so a WP editing session will be perfect to celebrate). - Bilby (talk) 01:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]