Jump to content

Talk:Motorsport marshal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge discussion (2007)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

current form is very "tarmac" centric (cars and bikes), while there is rally marshal and the marshal disambiguation page i think we need a "motorsport marshal" page that then describes the term generally with perhaps specialist article branching off for rallying, circuit/tarmac racing and even off road motorcycle sport. Pickle 18:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC) (a MX chief marshal among other things for my sins)[reply]

The previous message helped me to propose a merge. The main discussion for this merge is located at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Motorsport#Track_marshal_vs._Auto_race_workers_vs._rally_marshal.2C_etc. Please discuss there. Royalbroil 00:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed. Extensive flag info from Auto race workers was dropped since that is not suitable here. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Requested move (2009)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved to facilitate merge. Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 19:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Track marshalmotorsport marshal — The proposal of this is to merge this rally marshal and auto race workers into one single article as other than the type of circuit they work in, there are very little difference between the three — Donnie Park (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.


  • DOH - didn't notice the top where it says "The result was" lol

There are quite a few differences between the two continents, however there are many more similarities. Perhaps thought should be given to moving the differences into those separate articles leaving the Motorsport Marshal as the "disambiguation" as I could not see the change--Chaosdruid (talk) 08:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English variety

[edit]

@Dennis Bratland: This article was not "flipped" from one variety of English to another, as you put it. It used both interchangeably, often within the same section, which is not allowed per WP:ENGVAR, and I chose British as it appeared to be the primary variety in use on this page. It also seems the more natural fit as British spelling is used across the majority of motorsport articles that are not focused on North American racing. QueenCake (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But that is not what WP:ENGVAR says. It says the existing variety should be retained -- so all you have to do is look at the first edit to see this page began in US English -- "the variety used in the first non-stub revision is considered the default", says WP:RETAIN. Some editors did later -- in 2009, three years after the article was created -- come along and made additions using the wrong spelling, and that encouraged slouching towards UK English, which is exactly what the policy is supposed to avoid. I have no idea what you mean by "natural fit". Marshalls are used in racing around the globe. What reason is there to claim strong national ties to the UK, per WP:TIES? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't making that claim, simply telling you my reasoning after you asked for it. My only concern was the two different varieties of spelling used, which now appears to be resolved. The idea of sticking with the spelling of the original author regardless of what everyone else has used since is a tad silly, so I have no objection to ignoring it and making a call when faced with this situation. QueenCake (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It probably is silly but the point of the guideline is to settle these spelling disputes quickly and cleanly so we don't waste much time on it. If we allowed switching from spelling A to spelling B because over the course of a few years spelling B started to seep into an article, then nationalists favoring spelling A will say they're under siege and being persecuted, and a long and pointless discussion will ensue. Or worse, they'll retaliate. Stick to the guideline without exception, and the warring camps stay at peace. So please do not ignore this guideline and do not make arbitrary calls with regard to spelling. It's quite provocative to many editors, and has been the cause of some of Wikipedia's longest, lamest debates. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm of the exact opposite view of QueenCake: if it ain't broke, don't f*ck with it. Why create headaches over which variant to use when there's an established one? It may not be the one you normally use, but that's one of the problems inherent in EngWP... Get used to it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 01:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Motorsport marshal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]