Talk:Most of the Time
Most of the Time has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 11, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Orphaned references in Most of the Time
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Most of the Time's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ALLS":
- From If You See Her, Say Hello: Margotin, Philippe; Guedson, Jean-Michel (2015). Bob Dylan All the Songs: The Story Behind Every Track. Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers. p. 425. ISBN 978-1579129859.
- From Talkin' New York: Margotin, Philippe; Guedson, Jean-Michel (2015). Bob Dylan All the Songs: The Story Behind Every Track. Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers. p. 23. ISBN 978-1579129859.
- From Tangled Up in Blue: Margotin, Philippe; Guedson, Jean-Michel (2015). Bob Dylan All the Songs: The Story Behind Every Track. Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers. pp. 452–461. ISBN 978-1579129859.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Amended the ref in the article. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Most of the Time/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 20:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I will be reviewing this article. Please expect comments in the next few days. Artem.G (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments/questions
[edit]I have very few comments after first reading:
- Dylan had started constructing what he referred to as "stream-of consciousness songs". - if it's a quote, ref is needed
- Added. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think it would be nice to have at least few lines of lyrics quoted, maybe in 'Interpretations'. (I mean in a {{quote box} }, not inline. I think such quotation would be fair use, please correct me if I'm wrong.)
- I've added something, with commentary from Ricks specifically about it, so I think it's use is fair and in lne with WP:MOSLYRICS. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- with a number of critics opining that "Most of the Time" was a standout track.[16][17][18][19][9] - refs order
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Dylan played "Most of the Time" live 36 times on the Never Ending Tour. - is it a lot? or should it be understood as 'he played that song only 36 times'?
- Removed that number, as looking at the stats here [1], it's sort of in the middle for number of time played for tracks from Oh Mercy, and I couldn't think of anything particularly interesting to say about that! BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Two versions of the song were recorded on March 8, and six on March 12. Dylan recorded new vocals on March 16 and April 12. - though there is a yesr in the table, I think it would be right to include it to the first sentence.
- Added. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- [43][40] - ref order in the table
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Among the most versions: - sounds clumsy, maybe it can be just "Among the versions", or "Most known versions"?
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:59, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
The article is well-written, and very close to GA. I will go through the refs now, but I can't see any major problems. Artem.G (talk) 06:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for undertaking the review and for your constructive comments, Artem.G. Let us know if anything else is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- I've re-read the article, and it seems to me that everything is ok - references are appropriate, given to reliable sources, I checked some and didn't find any copyvio; images are 'fair use' and I agree with that. The article is well-written and broad, and also stable. So I think it's a GA. Congrats, BennyOnTheLoose, and thanks for a nice read :)