Jump to content

Talk:Morton Subotnick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

McClary Criticism

[edit]

Do people think it would unbalance this article too much to include something about Susan McClary's criticism of Subotnick? I came across his name in reading her influential article "Towards a feminist criticism of music" in Intersections (1990; 10, 2), in which she writes "the elite avant-garde continues uncritically to celebrate Morton Subotnick's new technologically advanced ways of enacting the beast's rape of the blind, handless but grateful female." (pg. 17) I assume this critique did not go uncriticized, but I haven't found it yet. I also haven't found any elaboration of this idea. What do others think? (if you think even having this quote on the talk page is unreasonable, given the visibility on Google searches, I won't be offended if it's removed) Mak (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion -- admittedly without digging much -- would be to start a "Reception" or "Critical reception" paragraph, and include McClary's critique along with maybe two or three others that are representative of the entire spectrum. McClary is a well-respected but controversial voice -- the pieces she wrote about 20 years ago seem to be the most extreme (at least of what I've read) but there's no question of her importance to contemporary musicology, particularly the branch studying gender and sexuality (which, without passing judgment, is quite active indeed). Antandrus (talk) 16:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The quote is glib and forceful but what is she saying? What beast? Is it about Subotnick's "Last Dream of the Beast" or "Passages of the Beast"? Or is the beast more general, perhaps the beast of classic electronica...? And what female? Is it a critique of the classic story of the Beauty and the Beast? I don't see the encyclopedic value of the quote, especially without edifying context. This article is supposed to be worded in a neutral tone, in accordance with WP:NPOV, and WP:BLP applies here, too, so we must be extra careful. Such fiery criticism from McClary must have a very strong basis for inclusion. Binksternet (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I've tried to find a place where she wrote more fully on the topic, but I can't, so I think it makes more sense to leave it out. Thanks for your input. Mak (talk) 20:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morton Subotnick.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Morton Subotnick.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hanging sentence

[edit]

Third para under "Silver Apples of the Moons" says, "In 1969 Subotnick was invited be part of a team of artists to move to Los Angeles to plan a new school of the." If anybody can complete this sentence, that would be nice. Opus131 (talk) 06:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear statement

[edit]

The paragraph about the Buchla synthesiser has an incomplete phrase; it states that the Buchla "was both more flexible and easier to use". Than what? Presumably the Moog, as this was the main rival to any other synth design, but this should be made clear. (I think Britain's Peter Zinovieff had created his own synth design by then, or would within a year.) -- 188.28.101.88 (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morton Subotnick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morton Subotnick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]