Talk:Morris Ten

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Different kinds of horsepower

Dear Lightmouse - I think it's great what you're doing, going through substituting conversion formulae for the bhp texts in the automobile articles. BUT with the very old cars (ie, here, the Morris Ten) you hit upon a misunderstanding which makes me think you are not as old as ... as I am.

BHP is a measure of a car's power output. I can't remember if the Americans (SAE) and the Germans (DIN) ever agreed how to measure it: that's outside the scope of thuis message in any case.

The Morris Ten (and a lot of British and French and Italian cars from between 1900 and 1940ish)was named after it's Tax horsepower. Back in 1905 tax horse power very roughly correlated with bhp, but by 1920 it didn't. Tax horse power in UK simply reflected the size and shape of the cylinders, I think - there's something in wiki about it under RAC Horsepower as far as I remember. The French and Italians had slightly different ways to define tax horse power, but theirs didn't, after about 1910, correlate with bhp either. And they, like the Brits, used these tax horse power figures effectively to define certain sizes / classes of automobile. Hope this is clear, but the relevant wiki articles are even if I'm not. Thanks again for the conversion upgrades you're doing. Must go. BestCharles01 (talk) 11:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand the issue. In addition to the issue you highlight, there are many cases for metric-designed cars where Wikipedia has incorrect hp values and these can only be resolved by having the kW value. Perhaps it is best discussed at the horsepower article itself or at the relevant wikiproject.Lightmouse (talk) 16:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mention before, but maybe should have done, that I tried this morning to put my para on your talk page but somehow I couldn't persuade it to startr a new section. Probably just me being dim, but I share the view that this discussion doesn't necessarily belong here. I'm afraid my understanding of the computer side of this project is pretty minimal, but if you can make the thing work, feel free to cut and paste the whole section from here to my talk page or to your talk page or anywhere else that makes sense to you.

Disentangling the reasons that can cause a bhp value to be wrongly quoted (I still suspect wrong copy typing within or from a source can be a common reason: charts and tightly packed paras of data in Observers' Books of cars and other erudite sounding directories must be very tricky for the publishers' staff to proof read.) is a whole other can of worms. A lot of things touching on vehicle specs is open to a lot of 'yes, but...' questions, and with bhp one isusually depneding on the maufacturers' published figure... Danger of drifting off topic... Regards Charles01 (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morris Ten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.morrisregister.co.nz/images/Brochures/Morris_Ten_Four_Six_low_mark.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.morrisregister.co.nz/images/Brochures/Morris_Ten_Four_III_low_mark.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.morrisregister.co.nz/images/Brochures/Morris_Ten_Four_M_low_mark.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203072602/http://www.morrisregister.co.nz/ to http://www.morrisregister.co.nz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]