Talk:Morris County Park Commission
This page was proposed for deletion by Drmies (talk · contribs) on 7 July 2022. |
A fact from Morris County Park Commission appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 July 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 20:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- ... that the Morris County Park Commission of Morris County, New Jersey, oversees over 20,000 acres of land, including a marina, an ice skating arena, a horse stable, a historical farm, and a gristmill? Source: "The Park Commission oversees one of the finest park systems in New Jersey. Provides over 20,000 acres of specialized park areas and facilities for recreational, leisure time, and educational needs of three million annual visitors. Includes ice skating arena, outdoor education centers, arboretums, golf courses, a marina, swimming-boating areas, trails (including one for the blind), para course fitness trails, camping facilities, a living farm, an operating mill, riding stable, and concerts." TAPinto New Jersey
- Reviewed: Norman Osborn (Sam Raimi film series)
Moved to mainspace by Thriley (talk) and Evedawn99 (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 19:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: It doesn't seem like the mission statement is needed, and it might come off as promotional especially on the main page. There are two reference issues that need to be taken care of - a bare URL and an error with the author's last name. A QPQ is needed. This is now ready. SL93 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thriley You have two more days to supply a QPQ. The article has also been prodded by someone. SL93 (talk) 23:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Marking for closure as Thriley remains unresponsive. The nomination can resume if a QPQ is provided. Note that the article has been de-PRODded so that should no longer be an issue, although if there are still notability concerns the article can be AFD'd. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5 I now see that a QPQ was added on July 8, but Thriley didn't leave a comment about it. SL93 (talk) 13:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I apologize for missing that. Other remaining issues do still need to be addressed however. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging Evedawn99 because Thriley isn't responding for some reason. I don't see a mission statement in the articles in the category County parks departments in the United States. I'm not sure why it would be needed and it makes an article sound promotional. The two reference issues are very minor as well. SL93 (talk) 20:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I was notified by Narutolovehinata5 on July 11th that this article has been nominated for DYK. I am grateful as a contributor to the article. I agree with the removal of the mission statement, as I believe this adds neutrality to the article. Thank you Djflem and Thriley for the edits. Please let me know if I may further be of assistance. The Fonz (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Evedawn99 The bare URL for reference 31 needs to be formatted. The 37th reference has a "last has generic name error" that needs to be fixed. I would fix these minor issues myself, but I'm annoyed that the nominator has an issue with responding. SL93 (talk) 21:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Refs 31 and 37 fixed —2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 04:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. SL93 (talk) 22:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe this tick will make it appear under approved. SL93 (talk) 22:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. SL93 (talk) 22:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Refs 31 and 37 fixed —2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 04:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)