Talk:Morgase Trakand

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Novels: Fantasy

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
	This redirect is supported by Fantasy task force.

Merge?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Minor Wheel of Time characters. -- Anthonydraco (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first vote here, mine, is agree. It's just one long paragraph that does not deserve one page on its own. Morgase does have some role in the books, but so many more have as much. She doesn't have that much data to put in. Merging it into a more viewed section will lead more potential attention and help to it as well. The worst problem here is that it's not cited with verified contents. Though I actually know some of them, it's not added here. And it's very unlikely that it will meet the notability requirement. Anthonydraco (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional characters that are "major" figures in literature are fine to stand alone. But... all your points aside, she's at most a borderline character in the context of the series--somewhere between a secondary and tertiary character. I'd say merge her content into the larger article. rootology/equality 00:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well, if anyone's counting. Nutiketaiel (talk) 11:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.