Talk:Morality and religion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morality and religion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Atheism Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity

To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members.
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt-an-article.
Help out with this to-do list.

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references).
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly.
Always write for an encyclopedia.

Articles to improve

Agnosticism

Create

Articles on notable atheists

Expand

an atheism stub

Immediate attention

State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

{{section link|Criticism of Islam|Morality}} The anchor (,Criticism of Islam,) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Reference chain problem

I tried to track down the referenced article "Religion's Effects On Crime Rates", cited as being by Edgar Saint George. The citation gives only a broken weblink. The actual reference that the cited, no-longer existing web article summarized is an article "Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies: A First Look" by Gregory S. Paul in the Journal of Religion and Society of the Creighton university of Omaha, Nebraska: http://moses.creighton.edu/jrs/2005/2005-11.pdf. Philgoetz (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morals, values, and ethics

I changed the word "moral" to "value" or "ethics" in some cases throughout the article. Various commentators, including religious ones, separate the idea of religion and morality. Thus, the use of a term like "religious morals" (or even "secular morals" for that matter) is essentially begging the question. As a result, the use of terms that don't make an assertion through their very use seems indicated.

This does not, of course, preclude the inclusion of passages from commentators using such terms if they are notable and relevant. In fact, a few such statements exist in the article now. --Airborne84 (talk) 17:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

I've gone through the article a number of times and I feel that the "positive-correlation" side has less material than the "negative-correlation" side despite the beginning of the article stating that the relationship is "complex" and difficult to understand. If there is more material to support that morality negatively impacts religion, then I feel that the beginning of the article should reflect that stance. Otherwise, I would suggest complimenting the "criticism" section with support for the contrary.

I may be pointing this out partially out of bias since I would say I am more "pro-positive correlation," but I find no mention of the counterargument for justification of religious text to commit crimes. There is no mention of strict or loose interpretations of said text. For example, the article claims that Hitler used Christianity as a justification to persecute the Jews, but I am certain there is the existence of credible sources that argue that Hitler was merely capitalizing on his self-identified faith and was really killing Jews primarily for other reasons. There is no mention of the possible relationship between humanitarianism and religion as noted in this study I found: http://www.humanitarianforum.org/data/files/resources/752/en/Geneva-Review-30.pdf

An example I wish to use to underscore this is the period of Spanish Colonization of the Americas. Not everyone knows that Christopher Columbus was a conqueror that abused religion as a justification for the pillaging and murder of millions of indigenous people, but fewer people recognize the efforts of Bartolome de las Casas, a man who literally risked his life several times to promote the rights of the indigenous people and bring awareness to the atrocities Spanish colonialists were committing. Many of his actions were motivated by religious reasons and they were arguably more authentic than whatever justification Columbus used. As such, I think more examples of humanitarian efforts inspired by religion should be added to the article.

I think it would be best to have the neutrality of this article in dispute. MikamiLovesDeleting (talk) 01:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is not objective article, it is biased and anti-religious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.110.83 (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC) This seems less like a discussion about morality in religion and more like an anti-religious tirade. 54.166.166.254 (talk) 23:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material in the lede

I removed the below passages from the lede. They seem to be unsourced. They also appear to engage in a discussion of what morality is. That may stray a bit too far from what is needed since this article can simply point to other articles that discuss this—with sources.

"Moral compass" is a metaphor or action for the direction one is compelled to take based on the ability to justify one's actions based on reasoning. Morality is an active process that requires critical thinking and consideration whereas religions expect adherence to religious codes, generalized and absolute rules that must not be broken or must be actively performed or carried out, depending on the religion and its rules. The distinction between morality as a verb and morality as a noun, is paramount in understanding what morality is, or simply put, how one ought to live.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Morality and religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Religious and moral education

Moral values attached to sacred places 41.223.75.81 (talk) 11:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]