Talk:Moral Machine

Philosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Contemporary philosophy

Contested deletion

This article makes a credible claim of significance or importance supported by a reliable source. Furthermore, the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, as evidenced by the references cited in the article. Therefore, the article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7. Thank you, Tony Tan · talk 01:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weird paragraph

Be sure to check the source for licensing concerns.

What happened here? Was this an accidental copy paste, generated by AI, or did someone write this as a guide? It seems to have been added in this change.

In general, the article feels like a summary that too closely follows the structure of a paper. It also seems to significantly rely on one source. SheepTester (talk) 08:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]