Talk:Moondance/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just a couple of minor things here:

Background: In the second paragraph, you speak of him making a third record. Isn't it his second?

Blowin' Your Mind! was his first, Astral Weeks his second. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Music and lyrics: sense of intense intimacy is not NPOV. It also sounds like a quote. If it is, give it as such.

I attributed that phrase to the author of the source, Brian Hinton. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception: End of second paragraph: Is LP in small letters in the source?

Yes, but it should be allowed under WP:MOS to capitalize them anyway. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should give sources for track listing and personnel. I guess that can be found on the album's booklet?

That's about it. I give the nominator(s) seven days to adress the issues. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]