Talk:Monumento ao Bombeiro

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 June 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Translation is complete

The page has been translated into English (obviously). Hopefully the translation didn't lose any of its essence. Please feel free to improve it, as my Portuguese language ability is a little rusty --Merkurix

A tradução é completo

A página foi traduzida ao inglês (obviamente). Esperamos que a tradução não perdeu nenhuma da sua essência de intenção. Por favor sintese desimpedido de melhorá, como a minha capacidade pa falar em portugues é um pouco mal--Não posso dizer muito em português--Merkurix 11:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

This is a self-made promotional page of dubious veracity. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Botelho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Korax1214 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalized

This article has been attempted to delete several times and must be watched by the community. Its vandalization as far as i can see —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.30.16 (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A properly-conducted AfD debate is not vandalism, unless perhaps made in bad faith, as mine wasn't (I have no emotional involvment with this subject). Also, your posts would carry more weight if signed, particularly if signed with an established username. -- Korax1214 (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, AfDs which are in bad faith are usually detected as such, and quickly closed. It would appear (from the only one of the three sources I can read, because being HTML rather than PDF, I can feed it through the Googlefish) that this sculpture may be notable after all; but the notability (if any) of the sculptor remains questionable. -- Korax1214 (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monumento ao Bombeiro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120212162850/http://www.cm-sintra.pt/revistaartigo.aspx?ID=9 to http://www.cm-sintra.pt/revistaartigo.aspx?ID=9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]