Talk:Montreal Alouettes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Montreal High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / Sport Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Separate Baltimore Stallions article?

It would be nice for there to be a separate page for the Baltimore Stallions that doesn't go here.

I Agree with that Ranul 08:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accent marks

I reverted an edit by 65.94.xx.xx (the IP changes, and it is always about Quebec related articles) because it seems wikipedia style is to use the name Montreal, without an accent. This IP has changed a number of articles. Dbrodbeck (talk) 04:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

i would like to see more about the clubs history see nfl clubs history for examples could see a bit more about logos and uniforms as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteelersLUFC (talk • contribs) 00:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 Montreal Alouettes

Perhaps (for accuracy sake), this article should be split into the original & current Montreal Alouettes. GoodDay (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I am not mistaken, the league regards them as the same team. Dbrodbeck (talk) 22:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An oddity to be sure. But, that's their choice. GoodDay (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hal Patterson - football player.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Hal Patterson - football player.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

It has just been uncovered that one of the more prolific editors of this article, User:Hassanaskia, has a history of violating our copyright policies, and unfortunately he has tainted this article as well. Substantial content he has placed here has already been identified as having been copied from several external sources. The article needs to be rewritten to remove all of the content he added. This seems to have been the last edit before he began working on the article. It is possible to revert to it and use it as a base to begin adding back content that was provided by others. I do greatly apologize to those of you working in good faith who are set back by this problem, but unfortunately we cannot allow the copyright infringement to stand. :/ --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Montreal Alouettes/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Start because of length/quality. TFCforever (talk)

Last edited at 06:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Montreal Alouettes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]