Jump to content

Talk:Monster (Kanye West song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMonster (Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2010Articles for deletionDeleted
September 4, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Music video

[edit]

So…the full video was just released and can be watched at kanyewest.com. I would update the section, but I don’t have the time to watch it in full at the moment.Onomatopoeiaieopotamono (talk) 07:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Depraved Scenes?

[edit]

The article states in the music video section "The nearly six-minute clip features an onslaught of depraved scenes". Isn't this a little bit biased and uncited?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Monster (Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jennie--x (talk · contribs) 21:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Comments

[edit]
  • Lead
  • The lead is four paragraphs long which is the maximum for an article of any size. This article isn't particularly long; could this be merged and edited to comply with WP:LEAD? Three paragraphs would probably be sufficient enough
 Done
  • Background
  •  Done
  • Composition
  • "In his deepest, most intimidating voice" sounds very journalistic and certainly isn't encyclopedic, this needs changing.
  • Reception
  •  Done
  • Music video
  •  Done
  • Charts and Release History
  •  Done
  • References
  •  Done

Overall Summary

[edit]
GA review
Final Summary
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (Is there clear sentences, spelling and grammar?): checkY
    b (Does it comply with MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists?): checkY
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (Is there a references section?): checkY
    b (Are there citations for quotes/statistics/challenging info?): checkY
    c (Does it contain no original research?): checkY
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (Does it cover the major aspects of the topic?): checkY
    b (Does it use summary style?): checkY
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    (Are points made with due weight?): checkY
  5. It is stable.
    (Are there no edit wars, etc?): checkY
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (Do the images have appropriate fair-use rationales?): checkY
    b (Do the images have suitable captions?): checkY

Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass

· · ·

Fixed the lead, and removed the questionable sentence. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]