Talk:Money for Nothing (1993 film)
Money for Nothing (1993 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 1, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Money for Nothing (1993 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Money for nothing.jpg
[edit]Image:Money for nothing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Money for nothing.jpg
[edit]Image:Money for nothing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Money for Nothing (1993 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: LM150 (talk · contribs) 19:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, happy to review this! Most of the article is in decent shape. But here's my initial comments:
- Your plot is a bit too detailed.. please keep it under 700 words as per manual of style (currently it's 771)
- Done now 690 words Chompy Ace 22:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Remove the actors names from the plot - these are already in the cast section
- "A Blu-ray Disc version was.." - remove the word "disc"
- "a total of $1.2 million in $100 bills" - not really necessary to write "a total of"
Thanks, my only other issue is this sentence:
- "Interesting in adapting Joey Coyle's story to film originated in December 1983, when a New York-based production company known as The Film Writers Company expressed interest in producing a film detailing his discovery of the money." - I think the first word is meant to be "interest" but you've used that word twice in the same sentence. I would rephrase it, eg. "The film adaptation of Joey Coyle's story originated in December 1983.."
Overall it's a neat article, and sourcing is fine. I know there isn't much to be written about this largely-forgotten film! Happy to promote shortly, thanks LM150 12:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class Philadelphia articles
- Low-importance Philadelphia articles
- GA-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
- GA-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles