Talk:Molly Dobbs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coronation Street, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Coronation Street and its characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Coronation StreetWikipedia:WikiProject Coronation StreetTemplate:WikiProject Coronation StreetCoronation Street articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008 July 19. The result of the discussion was speedy keep, no recommendations to delete.

Fair use rationale for Image:MollyCompton.jpg

Image:MollyCompton.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

The 2nd nomination of this article was of its lack of notability and references, the article was kept after the nominator was blocked indef for various other reasons, but it is still very small and stubby, and has NO refs, i have rated it as stub-class and will be left for some to collect information from the stub but if no improvements for some time i will have no choice but to renominate it or even place a speedy deletion tag on the article. User:Notdoppler 20:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the article was kept after the nominator was blocked indef for various other reasons

Not the case. The article was kept because not a single other editor believed it should be deleted. Two failed AfDs in 2 months demonstrate overwhelming consensus on the issue. A third AfD wont change that. Frickative 19:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now proved this articles notability. 86.143.121.28 (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol, you are blatently DodgeChris!!! FWIW, stuff about the actress doing a fun run is not relevant to this fictional character article.GunGagdin ^Moan 19:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should the page now be moved to Dobbs?

Given that the wedding has happened? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.117.32 (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope - WP:NAME says that we should always use the most easily recognised name for articles. The character has been called Molly Compton for 3 years, and Molly Dobbs for a few days, making Compton the most easily recognised name. A quick Google search returns 5,490 hits for Molly Compton and only 338 for Molly Dobbs. Dobbs redirects to Compton anyway, so searching Wikipedia for Molly Dobbs will still bring you to the article, whilst also satisfying policy on naming conventions :) Frickative 13:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, shouldn't we change Maria Connor/Sutherland as well? (Probably also the case with Sarah Platt.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.57.24 (talk) 23:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1]RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Molly Dobbs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081211160356/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk:80/entertainment/showbiz-news/celebrity-interviews/2008/12/11/exclusive-i-ve-turned-into-bridezilla-after-getting-ready-for-coronation-street-wedding-admits-vicky-binns-86908-20961699/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/showbiz-news/celebrity-interviews/2008/12/11/exclusive-i-ve-turned-into-bridezilla-after-getting-ready-for-coronation-street-wedding-admits-vicky-binns-86908-20961699/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Molly Dobbs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5wg6sk3pN?url=http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/ to http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]