Talk:Mojave Desert/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but this one's gonna have to be a quickfail.
- The climate section is almost completely unsourced
- weather2travel.com is used as a source for temperature data; it is an unreliable source
- the geography section is unsourced, and also incomplete. We'll want to know about specific natural features
- Cities and regions is mainly unsourced
- The natural features such as Devils Playground in the cities and features section could possibly go in the geography section or something like that
- Highways and major roads is a single sentences; needs expansion
- Parks and tourism is largely unsourced
- the list of musuems should be a prose paragraph
- the flora section needs expanded
- The fauna section should not just be a giant list
- Soil and plant conditions and protection sections are both unsourced and too short. More detail is needed on these topics
- The West Mojave plan litigation is undue weight.
- Too many see also links - see MOS:SEEALSO
- What makes constructioncompany.com a reliable source?
- what makes parlorsongs.com a reliable source
- All items in lead should be in body, there is stuff like the native name that is unique to the lead.
This is nowhere near to the GA criteria, so I will have to quickfail it, unfortunately. Hog Farm Talk 23:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the helpful criticism. I will begin working on this immediately. AurumIsGold (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)