Talk:Modernized load-carrying equipment

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

On 24 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Modernized Load-Carrying Equipment to Modernized load-carrying equipment. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 24 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Raladic (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Modernized Load-Carrying Equipment → Modernized load-carrying equipment – Commonly lowercase in sources. Not a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 05:53, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, in more specific terms per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS (and even MOS:MIL for that matter). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, and to be WP:CONSISTENT with the long string of prior military load-carrying equipment RMs. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.