Talk:Model Parliament

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article states that the next parliament was the Good Parliament of 1376. However, Good Parliament states that the parliament immediately preceding the Good Parliament was held in 1373. This is inconsistent. Can someone who knows English history better than I do fix this? Gwimpey 04:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there were quite a few parliaments between the Good Parliament and the Model Parliament. The editor who put in that comment may have meant that the Good Parliament was the next noteworthy/named Parliament, or may have been making an unfounded assumption based on the fact that it's the next parliament on the Wikipedia List of Parliaments of England. Either way, it's factually inaccurate. DCB4W 01:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

citizens?

"...each city provided two citizens." Surely this is wrong, aren't residents of Britain subjects and not citizens? Changed it to "residents", hope this is correct. Herostratus 17:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I suspect was meant is citizen(s) of the specific city. Rather than citizen(s) in the modern sense (i.e. the citizen of nation state). Hence the use of the term “Burgesses” earlier in the article (...two burgesses were elected from each borough...) to refer to representatives/inhabitants from Boroughs.

A Burgher was a freeman of a given borough so a citizen is(?) a freeman of a city. A Burgher had a specific legal status in medieval England. I’m not so familiar with the use of the word “citizen” for this period in history but suspect that it was of similar status*.

Each individual borough (and city) had rights and privileges specific to it, detailed in its own charter and customs. For instance medieval London had quite a high degree of local government with a mayor, a council of Alderman and a petty council and it’s citizens(!) exhibited quite a lot of political independence. While the city of Salisbury was politically under the control of it’s Bishop, until the 17th Centaury. Interestingly the freeman of Salisbury formed a guild (The guild of St George) which elected a Mayor and Alderman and was rival government to that of the Bishop. I believe that this sort of thing quite common in England, which is one of the reasons why some towns/cities have “Guildhalls” and others “Town halls”

Also, a Burgher (or other Freeman) moved from one Borough to another, he would not automatically given the same rights.

I’ve come across “Burghers” being used for freeman of London.

Unless there are objections, I shall put Citizen back

--Jalipa 11:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Model Parliament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]