Talk:Mod ruby
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Classes
[edit]How does sharing of classes among Apache processes make mod_ruby not safe for multiple applications? Is there a resource that describes this problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sutch (talk • contribs) 23:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- I marked this as [citation needed]. 200.127.223.79 (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- My guess is that it's because of a ruby program's ability to do runtime changes to any class. Sharing instances of the classes would allow one ruby app to change the behavior of other ruby apps on the same server. Still, I haven't seen enough talk of any real apache-based ruby serving option to know if this is the problem. --Busbeytheelder (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Future of the Project
[edit]As of 2015, see the link to the old homepage, it no longer seems to exist. Not sure if it will come back, possibly at a later time someone check again. Thanks. 2A02:8388:1601:E000:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 11:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mod ruby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)