Talk:Moamoria rebellion

Removing major portions of this page

@Chaipau, you have removed all the newly made edits that were made in enlargement of this article by just calling out dubious edits and unreliable source when I had in all cases used secondary sources. You had removed images which were linked to this rebellion. I have to call you out, but this was a very aggressive reverts you made without much justification or reason given.

ComparingQuantities (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edits are obviously dubious and need discussion. I have reverted them again. There are multiple problems.

There is a overuse of blockquotes. Wikipedia is not a pamphlet and you should not use blockquotes and visuals as if it were. It is not a coffee table book either. (MOS:QUOTE)
The sources are dubious, especially the use of Buranjis. WP:PRIMARY
Inserting assorted visuals with marginal relationships to this article (not clear and central) is not within policy either. WP:IMGCONTENT

There has been too many such edits and I reverted the article back to the last best form, without any loss to encyclopedic knowledge. All these edits have been useless.

If you wish to add anything, please do them step by step and discuss them here. Chaipau (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC) (edited) 02:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau I hadn't directly used Primary sources, all these edits that I had made were based upon secondary sources. I had referenced once Bhuyan's Rajeswar Singha and his times, but that's insignificant. This article does needs expansion for its far wide significance in Assam history, the 'second phase' is very dully written and well the 'third phase' in empty, how can it be called useful? Well I agree on the stance of quote box and image, this can be improved. Please review the sources that I had used. ComparingQuantities (talk) 07:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ComparingQuantities: please do not make major changes to the article without discussion here. I have restored the page to the earlier version. There are major issues with this article. If you persist you will be reported. Chaipau (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau Would you please check the sources I have not directly used any primary sources, I had once but I had it removed. I request you to verify it. ComparingQuantities (talk) 17:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ComparingQuantities: I have seen your use of secondary sources in a very WP:OR fashion, where you have interpreted the secondary sources and inserted your own opinion. If you wish to edit this article, please do so by adding individual pieces of information along with their attributions/references. We will discuss them individually. Chaipau (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then I assume that there is a problem with my writing style, I hope to improve it to match the Wikipedia standards. ComparingQuantities (talk) 05:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background

@ComparingQuantities Hello, I observed that you deleted content from the 'Background' section of the article without providing a comprehensive edit summary to explain the reason behind the removal. Could you kindly share the rationale behind this action? It is essential for all editors to have a transparent understanding of changes made to facilitate accurate and collaborative content development. Your clarification would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

AMNR0011 (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The removed part is a summarized repetition on what's there is the following sub-section. I found it as unnecessary additional text. ComparingQuantities (talk) 08:20, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying your perspective regarding the content removal. AMNR0011 (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]