Talk:Mitchell WerBell III

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

last name

Is the B really capitalized or no? Chris 02:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen many refrences to him and only a few use a small "b". Camel case seems to be the standard. However I can't say what the definitive source for this would be. Will Beback talk 08:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was Mr Werbell really in the OSS?

I've noticed on a Detachment 101 website that Mr Werbell is not listed as one of the members. Also a photo of him in a bizarre uniform features a shoulder patch of a unit that was not in Burma.Foofbun (talk) 00:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start with the website and photo. Can you give the sites you are referring to? Odestiny (talk) 01:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the photo quite some time ago in a book (remember those?) He was wearing a Commonwealth type slouch hat (as some Americans in the CBI did) with US khakis with a 503rd PIR patch on his right shoulder. A unit that was not in Burma (unless you believe 'Objective Burma') and something a real OSS operative would not be entitled to (I doubt he popped into New Guinea or Corregidor)Foofbun (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is a self-published bulletin-board entry considered a reputable "source"? Specifically, the JFK consipracy ravings from "Ecker." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.56.73.151 (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military rank

~~I have seen him referred to as Lt. General, such as in this book[1]. Has anyone heard differently? Angel's flight (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

It seems implausible. He may have received that title from some small government, but there's no evidence he spend any time in the U.S. Army. I doubt the OSS had ranks like that for agents. Will Beback talk 22:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan Army suppossedly made him a "Major General", the claims of Lt General come from a suppossed billet he was given in the 60's in SE Asia.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those would be good to add to the article there are adequate sources. Will Beback talk 23:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

::A source for the Afghan Army claim may be found here.[2] This source[3] says he was given a "simulated rank of Brigadier General" when he went to Vietnam as a weapons advisor. Angel's flight (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolnet.co.uk is not a reliable source. Didion says that he described himself as a "retired lieutenant general of the Royal Free Afghan" something, but does not say that he actually held that rank, an important distinction. Will Beback talk 01:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Edits by a sock of a banned user have been struck through. Will Beback talk 21:03, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Death by digoxin poisoning

Y'all do understand that the dosage of digoxin is usually measured in tenths of a milligram (100 micro-grams), and the usual liquid preparation contains 0.05 mg/ml (50 micro-grams/milliliter), so "4 to 6 ounces" at 30 ml/ounce would result in a total between 6,000 micro-grams (6 milligrams) and 9,000 micro-grams (9 milligrams) of the drug - more than enough to cause significant nausea and vomiting very rapidly. Additionally, the main effect of digoxin is NOT relaxation of the heart, but to make the heart bead stronger and more slowly, i.e., a heart *stimulant.* It would definitely be enough to cause him to seek medical help within hours at the most, and most likely would NOT particularly have contributed to his death several days later with no evidence of prior hospitalization.

I would rate the story of the poisoning at the Cotton Club as 'improbable' at best, agreeing with Mr. Isaacman.

http://reference.medscape.com/drug/lanoxin-digoxin-342432#0 DocKrin (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Father's Background

The census records to which I referred in my "citation needed" edit may be viewed here: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXMD-8YV?cid=fs_copy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.159.14.30 (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TNO reference?

WAS THAT A TNO REFERENCE 💯‼️🔥💯⁉️🔥‼️💯💯⁉️🔥💯‼️STRENGHT AND MUSCLE AND JUNGLE WORK STRENGHT AND MUSCLE AND JUNGLE WORK STRENGHT AND MUSCLE AND JUNGLE WORK STRENGHT AND MUSCLE AND JUNGLE WORK STREN 2.102.247.252 (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]