Talk:Mister Monday

Novels: Fantasy Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Australia: Literature

	Australia portal Mister Monday is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Confusing

Having never read the book, I find the plot summary very confusing. It should be rewritten to be more objective. Perhaps describe the overarching plot of the book, rather then a play by play. 108.202.194.109 (talk) 15:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

we should have the canadien book cover it's way nicer and it would show a bit more difrence in covers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs)

I think some information on the Sleepy Plague, should be added since it's important to the plot and since the article doesn't mention why Arthur entered the House in the first place.

--CmaccompH89 04:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the literary significant edition is the 1st and that is what should be included as part of the infobox. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

solution

The solution to the main problem of the story is never mentioned. Some detail should be spent describing the Nightsweeper. --CmaccompH89 17:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, very little about what happens after Arthur enters the house has been included at all. Could someone put it in? Strdst grl (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mister Monday/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Well, I quite agree with the Night Sweeper. I thought that was very clever of Dusk. But, my question is: what did anyone think of the book? I loved it - to be quite frank. I thought the article was quite good, but it tends to focus mostly on the beginning and none on the Night Sweeper, forgive me if I'm mistaken. I also beleive, this is a wonderful story to have children read. It opens their imaginations and is very charming without any vulgar comments. I've added in more about the Nightsweeper. Might not be enough, but I hope it is! 86.134.108.135 (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 00:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Edits

I just made a major overhaul to the plot summary, but forgot to put an edit summary down, so here it is: Redistributed the details of the plot summary to better represent the story, as well as several spelling errors. A Dozenalist (talk) 19:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]