Jump to content

Talk:Mississippi Highway 161/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 06:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Prose comments – Lead and Bolivar
Prose comments – Coahoma

More comments to come, but otherwise it's a pretty good start. SounderBruce 06:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up comments – Bolivar
Continuing comments – Coahoma
Prose comments – DeSoto

Alright, that should be it for now. SounderBruce 03:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 04:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Passing now. SounderBruce 04:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]