Talk:Mission of Honor

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Late-June/Early-July

I called Baen today, and the person who answered the phone (name unknown) said MoH would be out in late-June or early-July. I realize this does not qualify as an actual cite-able "Source", but even so, I'll go ahead and add it to the article.
LP-mn (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I just noticed the cover image is now available at baen's schedule page (http://www.baen.com/covers/1439133611.jpg).
LP-mn (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the cover image from Baen and fixed up the refs to use {{Cite web}}. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 75.23.248.232 :

To the Anonymous two problems with it.
1st, while I routinely have problems with forgetting to log in, I _HOPE_ I don't make major changes to a page without re-logging in, and tweaking it. That way some one who looks at the log has a way to get back to me with any issues. If you don't already have a user ID, please get one. If you do have one, please try to use it next time.
2nd, I myself read through the ARC very very quickly. So, I admit I could be wrong on this... It seems to me that some of the conclusions you reached, at least in paragraphs 2 & 3, _MAY_ be a bit off. I don't mean entirely WRONG, just not quite entirely correct. It will take a re-read on my part before I make a more definitive statement. I suggest you do the same.
LP-mn (talk) 04:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LP-mn (talk) 00:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 70.29.210.242 :

Dear 70.29.210.242 : I share your concerns about the Plot summary posted by 75.23.248.232, at least in regards to its total accuracy. However, if you are not going to bother to get a UserID or to use it when you post a {{plot}} and {{wikify section}} flag to an article, then I feel it is only fair to delete your flags. I will do so soon. Next time please log in.
LP-mn (talk) 04:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I could just delete the entire section as an unsourced plotdump, if you prefer it that way. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anyone can edit, so my tags are correct, and you said so. If you can't bother to fix the problem, you shouldn't delete the tags. Next time fix the problem. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 07:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't quite say that you were correct. What I said was that the other ALSO anonymous poster should double-check his information. I explicitly DID say that I could be wrong. And you still have not logged in. {BTW, just because anybody can edit the pages does not entitle everyone to behave in any manner they so choose.}
LP-mn (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LP-mn (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LP-mn (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The tags on the section are appropriate. The plot is too long and it hasn't been wikified. Please do not remove maintenance tags without addressing the problem. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 01:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked by LP-mn to have a look here. 70.29.210.242 has all the right in the world to edit this article in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines without ever signing up, if he so prefers. In my opinion this is precisely what he has done, and I am glad to welcome a new editor to Wikipedia, and especially one that takes an interest in David Weber's Honorverse. Debresser (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mission of Honor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511162248/http://www.baen.com/scheduleXML.asp to http://www.baen.com/scheduleXML.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Outside of the reception saying it sold well ("It debuted at #13 on the New York Times Hardcover Fiction Best Seller List.") I am seeing nothing to suggest this volume is notable. No reviews at ISFDb. Ping User:Cunard, User:Daranios... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotrus (talk · contribs). Here are some sources about Mission of Honor:

Cassada, Jackie (2010-06-15). "Weber, David. Mission of Honor". Library Journal. Vol. 135, no. 11. p. 15. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-06-03 – via Gale.
The review notes: "Fully realized characters and an incisive understanding of the military mindset lend believability to this dynastic space opera sure to be popular with series fans and lovers of military sf. "
Green, Roland (2010-05-15). "Mission of Honor". Booklist. Vol. 106, no. 18. p. 7. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-06-03 – via Gale.
The review notes: "... savaging its naval strength and incidentally killing many of Honor's relatives and leading to some critical revelations about the manipulation of both Haven and Manticore over the centuries by parties whose full identities and ruthlessness are yet to be revealed. Readers may feel confident that they will be Honored many more times and enjoy it every time."
"Mission of Honor". Publishers Weekly. Vol. 257, no. 20. 2010-05-17. p. 33+. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
The review notes: "Weber (Storm from the Shadows) combines realistic, engaging characters with intelligent technological projection and a deep understanding of military bureaucracy in the long-awaited 12th Honor Harrington novel."
Mark, Lardas (2010-07-04). "Harrington back in spotlight with 'Mission'". The Daily News. Archived from the original on 2023-06-03. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
The review notes: "Whether you're a longtime Honor Harrington fan or just discovering the series you will find "Mission of Honor" absorbing from the first page to the last. Indeed, David Weber's last page contains the most satisfying ending in the entire series."

Cunard (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunard 3 capsule, +1 regular (TDN). I guess here we can just change {{notability}} to 'sources exist'. Thanks! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]