Talk:Mission House (Stockbridge, Massachusetts)

Mission House (Stockbridge, Massachusetts) has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 17, 2013. (Reviewed version).

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date built?

The article says 1739, whereas the external link says ca. 1742. Where did the 1739 date come from? - Dunc0029 (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The NHL nomination papers say it was built in 1739. It's unclear why the Trustees claim it was built c. 1742 on their website, considering they probably had a hand in filling out the nomination papers. Magic♪piano 20:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mission House (Stockbridge, Massachusetts)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cdtew (talk · contribs) 16:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to undertake the review of this fine subject. I will attempt to knock it out in full by this evening. Cdtew (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: @Magicpiano:: Overall, a very good article, and appearing to meet all of the qualifications for GA status without too much tweaking.

"Before the arrival of British colonists in the area that is now southern Berkshire County, Massachusetts, it was inhabited by communities of the Mahican tribal confederation." - I almost feel that this would be better put as "Before the arrival of British colonists, the area that is now southern Berkshire County, Massachusetts was inhabited by communities of the Mahican tribal confederation." I'll leave that up to you, though.
- Reworded. Magic♪piano 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"a township of six square miles" - this likely needs a comparative conversion to metric, but since it's in word form I didn't want to throw in a numerical template. I'll leave that up to you.
- Added km2. Magic♪piano 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"She wanted to live outside the village, so Sergeant had a new house, the subject of this article, built on Prospect Hill, overlooking the village" -- I can't decide whether I think breaking the fourth wall in an article -- and mentioning that this is in fact an encyclopedia article in the text -- is my new favorite thing, or something that will rain down derision from other editors. What the heck, I like it, and it's very reminiscent of 18th century expository writing anyways.
- I normally don't, but I wanted it to be clear which of the two houses was the one being focused on here. Magic♪piano 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Jonathan Edwards, a famous minister during the Great Awakening" - Not sure how I feel about this. I think this sort of down-plays his role in the GA a little -- like saying "George Washington, a famous general during the American Revolutionary War..."
- I rephrased this; while there are a significant number of people who know who Edwards was, there are probably many more who don't. Magic♪piano 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No other issues present themselves at the moment. This is basically ready for promotion at this point, but I'll leave this open for a day or so in case you wanted to respond. Great article, and I'll have to visit this place when I'm in MA next year! Cdtew (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review (and enjoy your visit to MA when you make it). Magic♪piano 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: What do you think should be done about Mission House? It seems like there are enough Mission Houses to need a disambig. I mean, just off the first page of results, there's Mission Houses Museum, Mission House (Mackinac Island), Moravian Brethren Mission House, Old Mission House, First Mission House, Hermannsburg Mission House, Bodden Town Mission House, Grand Cayman, Mission (station), etc. I mean, I'm sure Mission House in New Zealand is important and all locally, but it seems like Mission House should be a disambiguation page, or there should at least be some hatnotes. I don't mind making the disambig, just figured I'd get your thoughts first. Cdtew (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I had'nt even noticed that Mission House (disambiguation) doesn't exist. It's also probably debatable about whether the existing Mission House should have primacy, but I'm willing to concede it in the interest of countering systemic bias (it appears to be a nationally significant property, similar to this one, and both get similar low amounts of traffic). Magic♪piano 00:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, and thanks for humoring me. Keep up with the great work! Articles like this make me wish there was still a more active "general" history WikiProject; I stick to MilHist only because of the sense of community. Cdtew (talk) 03:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]