Talk:Missing link (human evolution)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 April 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Evolutionary biology Mid‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human Genetic History (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History

Missing link

I say there isn’t any type of missing link showing any type of transfer of one species to another I’m not denying micro evolution but definitely denying Marco evolution change my mind. 2601:649:1:C320:4172:4D57:14DD:582C (talk) 06:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A standard example is Tiktaalik.

See also RationalWiki on this well-worn creationist talking point. It's a PRATT. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]