Talk:Miss World 1987

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Miss World 1987 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Beauty Pageants Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled

I don't get the scores. In the preliminaries, Trinidad and Tobago and Sweden got higher scores than Guam, yet Guam made it to the Top 12. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.253.72.178 (talk) 16:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Judges section restored

I have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1987 events is not plentiful, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources or not, the list of judges is completely irrelevant and in fact fancruft. The Banner talk 11:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Miss World events are viewed by millions of people when they occur, and dismissing content about the judges as "irrelevant" or "fancruft" does not hold water per the popularity of the event. You use the same rationale for all content you remove from various articles, but never address my rationale for the content's merit. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing the way you are following me around, I have difficulty with assuming good faith from your side. Especially because you often add related sources to prove something or comes with unsubstantiated stories as "It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage.". Just prove it with reliable, independent sources conform WP:RS. But I see nothing coming... The Banner talk 21:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss World 1987. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116054007/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1987.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1987.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]