Talk:Miss Read

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dead link

There's a dead external link on the bottom of the main page. 71.131.202.201 00:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)JB[reply]

I've changed it to point to an archived copy of the article. Thanks for pointing this out. Charivari 01:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Work on this page

I have been a Miss Read fan for many years and class her as one of my all time favourite authors. There seems to be a reticence on the part of the author, Dora Saint, to reveal too much about herself or have her works subject to scrutiny. No TV series, no interviews etc I would like to work this page up, but at the same time respect the author's reticence and privacy. I would welcome any suggestions from fans who would like to acknowledge appreciation for Miss Read, without compromising Dora Saint's preference [I am assuming] for a quite life and success without public glare or intrusion. Any suggestions or information gratefully accepted. Proxxt (talk) 13:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't article be titled "Dora Saint" instead of "Miss Read"?

It seems more logical to me for the article to be titled with the true name of the author rather than her pseudonym. "Miss Read" should redirect to "Dora Saint" rather than vice versa.

Wikipedia's guidelines seem to suggest this: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#Pseudonyms.2C_stage_names_and_common_names . But on further investigation, another article seems to suggest the opposite: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28people_with_the_same_name%29#Nicknames.2C_pen_names.2C_stage_names.2C_cognomens . I guess the second reference is more applicable. (So should I delete my original suggestion, or leave it here, just to be provocative?) Omc (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be called Miss Read, as this is the name this author is best known by. However, as talk pages are ignored, don't feel obliged to consult. I do appreciate your attempt to engage though. Proxxt (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]