Talk:Misleading of parliament

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Misleading of parliament is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Possibly useful link

" Mr Speaker, as you well know, having been in this place longer than the member for Wyong, this is the most serious motion that can be moved against a Minister."
"the Westminster tradition, [...] is that if a Minister misleads the House once, he or she is meant to go. "

Here in the UK this is also known as "Misleading the House" (see Google) and it's also used in India, Canada, New Zealand and possibly more. Timrollpickering (talk) 05:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]