(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
Prose is generally well-written and understandable to a broad audience. Minor clarifying phrases could be added in some areas. The use of certain punctuation points—specifically commas and semicolons—are either missing or unecessarily added depending on context and should be revised.
Pass
(b) (MoS)
Article complies with Wikipedia:WAF. Save for some revisions complying with MOS:ELLIPSIS, all should be good.
Partly done: The studio is an animation studio (as specified in its name) and therefore only produces animation, so "animated" would be redundant and repetitive.
Ah yes, that's correct. Optionally, if you're like me and like when multiple articles are consistent, you can remove the "Animated" in "Animated Pictures" and add "animated" back into "feature film". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The comma before Encanto is not strictly necessary grammatically, though not wrong either. Removing it would bring the article in line with similar articles, such as Mulan or Aurora, Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: Though it would be consistent, it would also be a MOS:SOB
Stephanie Beatriz should be noted as the voice actress earlier in the lead. Perhaps as: "Voiced by American actress and singer Stephanie Beatriz, Mirabel is depicted...". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me for asking, but why? I do not think the fact that Beatriz voices her had that much effect on her depiction...
Per Wikipedia:WAF, articles like these should keep their focus on a real world perspective. As such, I believe Beatriz's voice probably has the largest effect—aside from the animation itself—on her in-film depiction. In fact, now that I think about it, the second paragraph of the "critical response" section could be expanded to be slightly longer. At the moment, it's mostly just a list of terms describing the performance. Maybe consider expanding it to be about as long or slightly shorter than the first paragraph by making it less list-style. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also add a bit on what was praised about the voice actress' performance. The "critical response" section has a list of terms you could use. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As this is the lead, no citation is needed so long as its referenced in the text itself. With that said, can you tell me where in the text the "unite her family" part appears? The note about awards should also be made into its own sentence, maybe with a mention of who was awarded—actress, animators, etc—without naming the awards themselves. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Development
The first sentence sounds wonky and could perhaps be split into two. Maybe start with "During the production of Zootopia (2016)..." or something to that extend. Miranda's involvement would do well to be made into its own sentence. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried splitting the sentence, but it just kinda feels off to me... so I kept it whole...
Per MOS:LINK, Colombia probably shouldn't be wikilinked. However, it may be important enought here to warrant an exception. I'll leave that up to your discretion. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think MOS:LINK is part of the GA criteria anyways, so I'll leave it as it is
It is unclear what "position" means in "the vulnerability of Mirabel's position". Perhaps there is a better word or framing that could be used here. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The quote by Charise Castro Smith is difficult to understand. I better formatted it for you: Mirabel's position is "complicated and awkward and just utterly human and relatable [in] that [she] feel[s] like ... the unspecial one amongst everyone else who’s special and perfect and has it all figured out." Furthermore, the quote should be cited in the adjacent reference using the "quote" parameter. As citation six is used two other times in the article, it's fine to create a new identical citation that also includes the quote. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a guideline/policy that specifically mentions this? The closest I can find is WP:FQ...
You're correct, my mistake. I usually work on articles with Spanish sources, meaning that any time a quote is translated to English, the original Spanish quote needs to be placed in the citation. As all quotes here are in English, they don't need to be added to the citation. Castro Smith's quote is still difficult to understand though, and needs to be changed for clarity. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a Spanish word, "Mira" should be italicized. Also, quick note as a Spanish speaker: "Mirar" means "to look". "Mira" only means "look". This is noted in citation ten. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While "her motivation to be noticed" works, I personally found it a bit hard to understand. Perhaps replace "motivation" for "wish" or something to that extend. Also, add "that" to "stated" for "stated that her". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the fact that Beatriz watched many Disney films as a child is particularly notable; pretty much everyone has. Perhaps remove this and keep the fact that she describes herself as a fan. If you want, you can include her statement that she's a "deeply, deeply invested Disney adult" as that is more notable. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The final sentence for this section sounds a bit wonky. Perhaps remove "her finding a way to" and replace it with "helping her" for "she credited for helping her to". As mentioned before, long quotes like these should be cited on the corresponding reference.Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first and second sentences both use citation twenty-one. As there are no citations in between, the first one can be removed. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Casita" is a Spanish word and should be italicized here and in all future appearances. As Casita is the house's name, there may be an exception here. However, if that is the cases, instances where "the Casita" is used should be edited to remove "the". Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Add a comma after "Casita" for "connects her to the Casita, so her outfit incorporates". 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
The word "skirts" is repeated several times in succession. Replacing "traditional Colombian skirts" with "designs" could help alleviate this. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The fact about her name meaning "look" is repeated here. Remove if from either this paragraph or the original depending on where you think it fits best, but don't keep both. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In note B, remove the wikilink to Colombia. Whether or not you decided to keep or remove it earlier, either way it would either be unnecessary or repeated. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Specify who Mariano is as he hasn't been mentioned before. Keep it short though. Actually, remove mention of it entirely as it's unrelated to Mirabel's arc. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did some digging around for the actual products and the Disney doll that sings "The Family Madrigal" and the Jakks Pacific Large Doll are two different products. The cited source's text is a bit unclear as to which product is which, so perhaps a different source could be used. Lzer (talk) 07:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done: I couldn't find good enough sources to change the ref, but I also thought on my own to replace the wording. It looks like Pamzeis went ahead and finished this part of the section. Lzer (talk) 12:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A link to The Art of Encanto would be nice. The one on Google Books would do, though another official source works. Obviously, illegal pirate PDFs shouldn't be added. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 05:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nowhere in the article is Noemi Josefina Flores cited as Mirabel's younger actor. It's worth adding a sentence with a coinciding citation in the "voice" section or at the very least in the infobox.
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Pass
Done
Partly done: The studio is an animation studio (as specified in its name) and therefore only produces animation, so "animated" would be redundant and repetitive.
Not done: Though it would be consistent, it would also be a MOS:SOB
Replaced
Removed
Added
Fixed
