Jump to content

Talk:Minneopa State Park/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Swpb (talk · contribs) 20:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Some minor grammar quibbles where the grammar isn't necessarily wrong, but could be clearer, particularly w/rt commas. I will do a copyedit for these.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Plagiarism check turned nothing up.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Nice balance.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Very nice selection of images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Nice work!