Talk:Mine clearance organization

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Organizations Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to mine clearance agency. Ucucha 14:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mine clearance agencies → List of mine clearance agencies — Whether it is in bullet-point format or not, this article is definitely in list format as it does not describe the subject so much as simply give examples. Re-titling it would be the first step in cleaning it up. —Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I do not agree with your assessment that "this article is definitely in list format as it does not describe the subject so much as simply give examples". There is a 67 word paragraph as the intro of the article. The "Humanitarian mine clearance agencies" section has an intro of 135 words. Then each organisation is described with a paragraph of prose. The Section on the United Nations is quite list-like but can easily be edited into a more fluent prose format. Turning this page into a pure list article will result in a substantial loss of information - wholesale deletion of many paragraphs. I think it would be much better to take this article in the other direction and instead of deleting what detail there is we add more. That will also address your concern that "it does not describe the subject so much as simply give examples". Rather add to it than strip it down. Roger (talk) 06:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In that case the page should be moved to mine clearance agency per our naming conventions, as the subject is singular. I cannot see any logical reason for the page to use the plural form. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Norwegian Peoples Aid logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Norwegian Peoples Aid logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mine clearance agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]