Jump to content

Talk:Million Dollar Maybe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMillion Dollar Maybe has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 13, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Simpsons episode "Million Dollar Maybe" will feature a new character created by the winner of a fan-contest organized by the staff of the show?

Image

[edit]

There is a promo image I don't know how to put it on can someone do it for meTheSimpsonsRocks (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC)TheSimpsonsRocks[reply]

Where is the image? warrior4321 15:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded ;) Francisco97 (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is also another pic of Richardo I think we should upload it here's the link: [1]TheSimpsonsRocks (talk) 02:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)TheSimpsonsRocks[reply]

Parady

[edit]

Zii for Wii Funtendo for Nintendo --Cooly123 01:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talkcontribs)

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Million Dollar Maybe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 11:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.
Short review
  • References 1, 2, and 10 are dead
  • "Million Dollar Maybe" should be in italics, not "in quotation marks"
  • 1 million should have currency prefix (USD)

Plot

[edit]
  • "Favorite CD" is not specified in the episode.
  • "cousin" should be capitalized, as a prefix
  • "it" should be specified since it could mean other things.
  • 1st paragrafe should be trimmed, as it does go in unessesary detail such as the last sentence.

Production

[edit]

Reception

[edit]
  • Found none

Discussion

[edit]

I'm putting this on hold for 3 days. There is not alot, so a shorter grace period is in order. Can go up to 7 days on request.

Should be good now. :) —DAP388 (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just a couple of comments from an uninvolved editor
  • "Million Dollar Maybe" should not be in italics; per the MOS, episode titles should be in quoatation marks (see Wikipedia:ITALICS#When not to use italics)
  • Disagree that currency needs to be any more specific than $. WP:CURRENCY advises being specific when the context is unclear. Although not explicit, I'd argue that the lead makes it clear enough that the context is the US, and changing $ → US$ would add unnecessary clutter. Just my opinion, but either way, it's not covered by the GA criteria.
  • "cousin" shouldn't be capitalised in English as it is a common noun, unless you are reading it as "cousin" being part of her name/title, in which case surely it should be "... do a singing toast at Cousin Valerie's wedding"? It's comparable to "... do a singing toast at his mother Valerie's wedding."

--BelovedFreak 13:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Million Dollar Maybe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Million Dollar Maybe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]