Talk:Millbourne, Pennsylvania/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 20:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Will review this, but there seems to be major sections without sources, as well as many essential sections (as laid out in WP:USCITIES) completely missing. SounderBruce 20:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 17, 2022, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: A variety of MOS issues, including external links in prose, lack of Sentence case in titles, casual language, and poor organization.
- 2. Verifiable?: Most sections are uncited and do not appear to be reliably sourced.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Several essential sections are missing, including the History, Arts, Government, Parks and recreation, Media, and Infrastructure/Transportation.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Several sections are written with a promotional tone.
- 5. Stable?:
Pass - 6. Images?: Image sizes do not need to be manually set, and they should generally be right-adjusted.
I think it would be best if the article was overhauled and expanded before another review is requested. Please look at existing neighborhood and city GAs before proceeding.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— SounderBruce 07:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)