Jump to content

Talk:Millî Görüş

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

antisemitisim

[edit]

Why is nothing mentioned in this article about the fact that they have been accused of antisemitisim?


Why should it? It's nothing special to hate jews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.128.150 (talk) 18:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

notability established

[edit]

The topic seems notable enough for an article - this prominent (and very controversial) religous movement has had a lot of coverage from secondary sources in Europe, in particular in Germany. Among others, they have been the subject of public debate in Germany since they were put on the observation list of German Verfassungsschutz (secret service). See the German version of this article, de:Islamische Gemeinschaft Milli Görüş, for more information and sources.

In fact my impression is that some relevant aspects, in particular regarding "critical reception", are missing from the article.

I will remove the notability tag, and change other tags accordingly. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is an ideology. We might need to change the stub templates. His parties are the organizations (that follow this ideology). DenizTC 13:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's NOT a Muslim encyclopedia here

[edit]

I removed the section "what does Mili Gorus.

1/ Because this etymology is wrong, it's not Adam or Eve, it's Milli Gorus = "national vision"

2/ Because it's written by a Muslim, for Muslims, it's preaching, not writing a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is neutral, not an ad for islam. It's not necessery to quote Quran every line, neither to define the islamic doctrine, etc, it is supposed to be a section about etymology.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Millî Görüş. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needs what it actually is

[edit]

This article focuses on scandals etc and doesn't actually say in any detail what it *is*. Secretlondon (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heavily outdated

[edit]

Subject matter has been heavily outdated 84.29.1.182 (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]