Talk:Milken Institute

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

BethNewcomb (talk · contribs) has been paid by USC Davis School of Gerontology Office of Communications. Disclosed here
OrliBelman (talk · contribs) has been paid by USC Davis School of Gerontology Office of Communications. Disclosed here
LarryWeisenberg (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown on behalf of Michael Milken. Disclosed here

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note

I am a representative of Michael Milken. I would like to correct several inaccuracies recently posted to the Milken Institute page. They are:

1. Milken is identified as a “former bond trader.” In fact, his role at Drexel Burnham Lambert was far broader than mere trading and involved a wide range of securities besides bonds. Beginning in 1969, he financed the growth of more than 3,200 companies using many types of debt- and equity-based securities. Accurately, and I believe objectively, an established consensus on his biographical page describes him as a “financier and philanthropist.” I recommend this approach.

2. The recent editorial addition of July 20 says Milken was “imprisoned for racketeering and securities fraud.” This statement is correct only in reference to securities fraud. He was never imprisoned for racketeering and that reference must be removed. In addition, the description now links Milken’s prison sentence to the founding and mission of the Milken Institute, connections that have no basis in fact and which are easily construed to be introducing a negative POV that are outside Wikipedia standards. In fact, in the History section of this page, the founding of the Milken Institute is more accurately described. Given that this section is a factual description of the Milken Institute, I recommend keeping the mission of the Institute in the second paragraph, and the founding of the organization in the History section.

3. The new edits also include a statement that the Institute “claims” to be nonpartisan. Factually, the Milken Institute is a nonpartisan organization - it has never taken partisan positions and does not endorse political candidates, parties or party positions. The only reason for this addition can be to create a negative POV and cast doubt on the organization without attribution. This should also be changed by removing the words “claims to be.”

4. Additionally, the July 20 editor has added that the Institute “does not disclose its donors or funding sources.” The inclusion of this statement is not only inaccurate, but can only be added to create a negative POV. First, like any other 501 (c) 3 organization, the Institute files all proper documentation with the IRS, and its Form 990 is public information. Secondly, the Institute publicly thanks its sponsors on its website and at its annual Global Conference and other events. The statement should be removed.

Thank you. LarryWeisenberg (talk) 21:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merges

There are separate articles for various Milken activities, and it is proposed to merge them into Milken Institute.

John Nagle (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Milken Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.berkeleydaily.org/issue/2001-01-22/article/3103?headline=Michael-Milken-legacy-in-dispute-pardon-or-not
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090930192252/http://www.milkeninstitute.org/index.taf to http://www.milkeninstitute.org/index.taf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]