Jump to content

Talk:Military mail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Warning

[edit]

Probably not a good idea to place advertisements on this page.

Daily occurrence on many articles - "rv linkspam" is the standard edit message we use. Stan 16:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance to stop placing ads on this page. Next time you do it, your IP addresses and account info will be banned from Wikipedia.

Expansion request:APO, DPO, and customs

[edit]

Does the US government waive technology export restrictions on mail to APO/FPO/DPO/pouch/whatever and what differences, if any, exist between its exposure to host country customs and that of mail through their own postal systems? What is the relationship of APO and diplomatic pouch mail & DPO? MrZaiustalk 02:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The US Government has seperate agreements with each country it maintains facilities in, so what is mailable to any military post office depends on the country said post office is located in. In general, however, mail sent to an APO/FPO/DPO is subject to the same restrictions on mailing for the country it is located in as are found in the IMM[1]. I don't normally deal with diplomatic pouches, so I will have to research their uses & restrictions before adding to the article. Customs procedures in any given country are normally virtually identicle to the way civilian foreign mail is inspected, although military mail is usually handled exclusively by US military/dod civilians at military installations. Customs for the host country usually will have a small office in the facility where the mail is handled and will deal with the mail according to host country guidelines (but usually observed by a member of the US military while actually opening and searching boxes & sacks). I will find the references for this info & update article accordingly soon. --124.40.49.83 (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As written in the USPS Handbook T-7 (Transportation of Military Mail by Air), Chapter 7, "The U.S. State Department, by agreement with the USPS, moves all categories of personal and official State Department mail in special diplomatic pouches. The tag (Exhibit 710) affixed to the diplomatic pouch will indicate the desired method of transportation for the pouch to it's destination (.e.e, Priority or surface). (State Department pouches also move as air cargo outside the U.S. mail stream.)" In addition, the T-7 provides that diplomatic pouches not addressed to APO/FPO overseas destinations are moved as USPS civil mail and are not to be opened under any circumstances. As such, any diplomatic mail is not under any restrictions (except those imposed by the State Department). Chapter 1 of the Handbook T-7 defines APO/FPO Mail as "Domestic mail addressed to or mailed from a military unit". Because it is defined as regular mail, mail addressed to APO, FPO, and DPO destinations that is marked "Supposed Liable to Customs Duty" is subject to the Prohibtions and Restrictions listed in the IMM, so no exceptions are granted for technology export. Personal APO, FPO, and DPO mail is treated as per the 4525.6-M and DMM while diplomatic pouches are afforded special priveleges (exempt from customs). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.251.239.2 (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DPO

[edit]

It might be nice to break portions of the DPO information out into Diplomatic pouch to avoid overly bluring the line between APO and FPO and, more importantly, to clearly discuss where that line is and what the role of APO/FPO is for non-military customers at posts abroad. Doing this would result in a much more clean approach to the piece and higher accessibility for the recent additions. MrZaiustalk 08:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Funding sources? Time for a split

[edit]

If the APO section of the article has gotten so far into the weeds that multiple editors think it absolutely has to discuss such inane details as its funding sources and administrative structure, it's time to split it out. It was already bordering on undue weight (ignoring the sloppy spacing, this section dwarfs all other nation-specific examples), but I do believe we've just crossed into the weeds, over that line. Splitting would also allow some discussion of addressing systems etc. MrZaiustalk 02:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. The current integrated MPS needs a reference here and an entirely new article on the evolution of the separate services' mail systems into the modern version. There is a long and complex history behind APO, NPO and diplomatic mail that deserves more attention while being entirely inappropriate for worldwide coverage of military mail systems. Anyone with a real interest in U.S. military mail could probably do a full article on the history and function of each up to MPS. Palmeira (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source for "state" codes?

[edit]

I'd appreciate a source for the 2 letter codes used for US military mail. A 21 Jan edit of another page changed one from AL to AE. DanConnolly (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Military mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Military mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Military_mail&oldid=1209064079"