Talk:Military history detachment

A fact from Military history detachment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the United States Army sends Military History Detachments to war zones to collect historical documents, such as oral histories, for writing histories?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/July.

Wikipedia

Military history: Historiography / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Title?

Military History Detachment or Military history detachment? – ukexpat (talk) 01:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My thought was that it is a type of official military unit always capalized in the references that I saw. I mean, you wouldn't do 101st Airborne Division as 101st airborne division, would you? Sadads (talk) 11:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. The article is about the generic military history detachment, not about a particular one. So just as we we would say that the 101st Airborne Division is a specific airborne division, we would say that the 46th Military History Detachment is a specific military history detachment. Indeed the first and third references refer to them as "military history detachments". – ukexpat (talk) 02:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]