Talk:Military computers

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military computers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Regarding the previous copyright tag; I check some of the text and did not find it anywhere else. Chassisplans 23:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last paragraph sounds like the conclusion of a vague term paper. --72.54.44.153 14:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing reference to Electromagnetic Pulse Protection

There needs to be a reference to the following standard for protection against EMP

http://www.tscm.com/MIL-STD-464.pdf

This is because my first job as an electronics engineer in 1985 was in military avionics, and every piece of electronics had a crowbar circuit to protect against it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashJackFromGundagai (talk • contribs) 15:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still a subtle advertising page

Still reads like a Chassis Plans subtle ad. YMMV 212.188.108.178 (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Adoption Rate

"The progress of small-scale computer technology in military applications was initially slow due to concerns about security and the ability to survive rugged environments and enemy weaponry. PC-based technology in the 20th century was not robust enough to withstand combat conditions and severe environments."

Not to mention that until the late 80's, soldiers had the option to be a grunt, a CO, or a civilian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.83.96 (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military computers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928103608/http://www.arcyber.army.mil/org-uscc.html to http://www.arcyber.army.mil/org-uscc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]