Talk:Military budget of Russia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Military budget of the Russian Federation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140208055140/https://milexdata.sipri.org/files/?file=SIPRI%20milex%20data%201988-2012%20v2.xlsx to http://milexdata.sipri.org/files/?file=SIPRI%20milex%20data%201988-2012%20v2.xlsx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305133919/http://themoscownews.com/russia/20120417/189640006.html to http://themoscownews.com/russia/20120417/189640006.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140208055140/https://milexdata.sipri.org/files/?file=SIPRI%20milex%20data%201988-2012%20v2.xlsx to http://milexdata.sipri.org/files/?file=SIPRI%20milex%20data%201988-2012%20v2.xlsx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
The structure
[edit]The page needs a lead. Xx236 (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
March 2023
[edit]Hi Team, I just completed a 90+ citation article recalculating the estimated Russian military budget for 2023 at about $1 trillion dollars. It draws heavily from SIPRI, Tradingeconomics, OECD, CIA World Factbook, EIA, Statista, and other reliable sources. It is the most complete survey of reported financial information regarding Russia and is far more complete and systematic than existing articles on the topic. https://aaronlee.substack.com/p/one-trillion-dollars-in-2023-how
I'm not very technical so if I make the changes incorrectly, the principled thing to do would be to examine my research and methodology before rejecting changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:C480:25D0:FD9D:D4A0:7AE7:98E6 (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Don't delete Aaron Lee changes without discussing first on talk page. It is an article with over 90 citations. It does not matter if I wrote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:C480:25D0:4EC:B77B:9F05:4A25 (talk) 03:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- You may cite those sources directly. Personal blogs are not acceptable. See (edit: see below) WP:SELFPUBLISH and WP:USERGENERATED. Hypnôs (talk) 03:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Someone is violating TOS for wikipedia (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution) for deleting a thoroughly researched article using SIPRI, World Bank, EIA, and others. Though I brought it up in talk, there is no discussion. Just deletion of important information. YOU CANNOT DELETE THE LINK WITHOUT FIRST EVALUATING THE RESEARCH!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:C480:25D0:1905:4254:C253:8D6E (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- If you wish to add any information from the reliable sources you mentioned, you are welcome to do so, if you cite them directly. Your self-published blog is unfortunately not acceptable as a source.
- I linked to WP:SELFSOURCE previously, instead of WP:SELFPUBLISH. I apologize, if this has caused any confusion. Hypnôs (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Someone is violating TOS for wikipedia (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution) for deleting a thoroughly researched article using SIPRI, World Bank, EIA, and others. Though I brought it up in talk, there is no discussion. Just deletion of important information. YOU CANNOT DELETE THE LINK WITHOUT FIRST EVALUATING THE RESEARCH!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:C480:25D0:1905:4254:C253:8D6E (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)