Talk:Mila 18

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why Russian and Anglo-Saxon names?

The term ghetto takes on a clearer meaning as the courageous Jewish leaders fight a losing battle A clearer meaning? Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.52.249 (talk) 00:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catch18

I heard that Catch22 was renamed from Catch18 because this book was released round that time and Heller bowed to making the alteration as he was the newer author.--Nasher (talk) 16:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This may be true. It has been well documented that the original title was not meant to be Catch-22, but that a different number was to be used. Heller first published part of the book as a short story named Catch-18 (New World Writing, 1955). When the book was about to come out (in 1961), somebody pointed out that it may lead to confusion with the book by Leon Uris, this is often referred to. Other suggestions for the number were 11, 14, and 17 (maybe even more). Heller wanted a repetitive double digit so settled for 22 (in the book things are often repeated: duplicity, and repetition is a common theme for the insanity of the world, i.e. Major Major who is to become Major Major Major Major, a commanding officer who did not like to command). 22 is 2 (duplicity) repeated (duplicity again). There are those who suggest that the fact that the book is called Catch-22 was used by Heller to implicitly suggest that there would be a sequel (which appeared as Closing Time, which was first published in 1994, 33 years later). Catch-22 does not exist. But is now a commonly used expression for senseless rules or rules which contain a circular argument. --83.160.198.125 (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]