Talk:Mike Zammuto

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Redirect or not

I feel that the decision to delete this article should be discussed rather than having the content replaced with only a redirect. The subject is not clearly non-notable, and the material was not incurably promotional. It might be salvageable if more reliable sources are out there. WondermentG (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly have no problem discussing it. It's not necessary for you to send it to AfD just to discuss a redirect; you can just revert, like you did, and then open a discussion here, which you did. Then we talk about whether we want to redirect it. If you're going to go ahead with the AfD you have to fix it somehow, as the link in the template doesn't lead to an actual AfD. I don't think an AfD is necessary before discussion, but if you really truly think it is I can probably help you figure out how to fix the AfD template stuff. Let me know what you prefer, and I'll either argue for redirection here or else fix the AfD and argue for it there.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]