Talk:Mike Scully/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
This article is well written and is sufficiently compliant with the MoS.

I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All on line references are live

The article is adequately referenced.

All references appear to be WP:RS

All the on-line sources support the cited statements. I assume good faith for off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article is braod and focussed. It will need contious updates as Scully's career progresses.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One image used, correctly licensend and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Well, this is good to go. I am happy to list this as a good article. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]