Talk:Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I created the article, with two sections: "Background" and "The Decision." I intend to expand both sections in the coming weeks. Trsg (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "undos" made on September 3, 2009 were due to the deletion of a reference after an edit. Other references that referred back to the deleted reference became orphan, and a full original reference had to be introduced in the appropriate place. Trsg (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pvt

What does "Pvt" (in the case name) mean? Apokrif (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it just means "private." Trsg (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Statements at Westminster Hall by Benjamin John Freeth

These were added to the "Post-Development Decisions" section. Interesting comments, but I don't see how they affect the case or why they constitute a "development." I propose that everything from "Intervention of the Uncle..." until "birthday honors 2010" be deleted. Trsg (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successful seizure of Zim assets in South Africa

Perhaps some mention could be made of the applicants' success in seizing Zimbabwe government assets in South Africa, eg. [1]? - htonl (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted - done 85.210.192.172 (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]