Talk:Mika Brzezinski

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mika Brzezinski article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

June 25 to July 1, 2017 (13th)

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Homophobic slur

Why are some editors falsely claiming[1][2] that Brzezinski's homophobic remarks about Pompeo were made in a tweet? Politrukki (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Supposed "Support" of Donald Trump

I've noticed this article and Morning Joe's wikipage contain the unsourced claim that Brzezinski "supported" Trump's campaign for president. To my knowledge, Brzezinski and Scarborough were criticized for repeatedly interviewing Trump on their TV show and not for defending his policies or directly endorsing his candidacy. Based on her statements in these Morning Joe interviews I think it's fair to say that Mika Brzezinski did not support Trump at all in 2016, let alone in the same way Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity did and do now. I've edited this section to remove the phrase "supporter of Trump" entirely, and the subsequent claim that Mika "turned against Trump" after he attacked her on Twitter in 2017. At best, this language violates WP:NPOV. At worst, it conflates repeated and ineffectual interviews with direct political support.

Does anyone have alternate sources criticizing Brzezinski for the same reasons as the Rolling Stone article? I'm not sure if it's too biased/opinionated to present a fair account of the controversy here. ⁂ (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]