Talk:Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bricker Amendment
[edit]For some time I have been working on revisions to the Bricker Amendment article. I finally posted it and have a PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Bricker Amendment/archive1. I'd welcome comments. I know all those references may seem extravagant, but I'm hoping to get it as an FA and those voters want lots of footnotes. PedanticallySpeaking 16:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if I am doing this incorrectly, but I don't want to edit your actual article. I just want to send you a comment. What you list as sections of "the treaty" are actually sections of the statute.
Picture Added
[edit]This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Hi, I'm a senior wildlife biology student whose assignment was to add a photo to a wikipedia page. I donated a personal photo of the eagle feather to the commons and added it to the article in order to help illustrate the portion of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act that prohibits the taking of raptor bird parts for their protection. I hope everyone else feels this photo was an appropriate contributions.
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing!
Tperkins2 (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Criminalization of feather possession
[edit]I think the article should include a statement pointing out that this Act criminalizes the possession of feathers of any of these species, even unintentionally, as this is something that the "common man" would not expect to be illegal. Having a feather stuck to a shoe and having it tracked into one's house can result in 6 months in prison or a $15,000 fine. Comments? 152.51.48.1 (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Unknown-importance Environment articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Wikipedia articles as assignments