Talk:Miente

Miente has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 26, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music: Tropical music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tropical music task force.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Miente Enrique.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Miente/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 20:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Tomorrow --K. Peake 20:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, tomorrow, I'll be at Universal Studiostudios after getting the Pfizer shot. Erick (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude You can respond in one of the following days then, as I'll review today due to starting work for this week tomorrow. --K. Peake 06:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Remove the recording date, as it is only sourced as beginning that year
Remove the word studios from any of the ones in the infobox since that is of the same name as the parameter; Estudios Nadir is an exception because the first word only includes studios as part of it
Pipe Ocean Way to Ocean Way Recording
Wikilink uptempo per MOS:LINK2SECT
Pipe pop to Pop music
Wikilink power ballad
Remove wikilink on piano per obviousness
Pipe percussion to Percussion instrument
"three music journalists who felt it was" → "three music journalists, who generally considered it" with the pipe
"Commercially, it topped" → "Commercially, the song topped" plus start a second para at this point
"later covered by Puerto Rican singer Robert Avellanet on" → "covered by Robert Avellanet on"
"album Sentir (1999) as" → "album, Sentir (1999), as"
"peaked at number 23 and nine on the" → "peaked at numbers 23 and 9 on the US" per MOS:NUM
"respectively and was a" → "respectively, and was a"
Mention the accompanying music video in a sentence after the above one

Background and composition

"in the US." → "in the United States." per MOS:US
"on December 1995 and was" → "in December 1995, before it was"
"composed for the was" → "composed for the album was"
Wikilink uptempo per MOS:LINK2SECT
"power-pop ballad," → "pop power ballad," with the pipe and wikilink
Remove wikilink on piano
Pipe percussion to Percussion instrument
Either reword the lyrical meaning sentence to make it clear that the lover is Enrique if the source shows this, or change the lead to saying "deals with one" elsewise.

Promotion and reception

This section is largely out of order currently; the reviews and commercial info for the original should be at the very end of the section, with Enrique's release info coming first then the cover version
"Similarly the San Antonio Express-News editor Ramiro Burr felt it was" → "Similarly, the San Antonio Express-News editor Ramiro Burr felt the song to be"
"chart where it spent three weeks in this position." → "chart, at which it spent three weeks."
""Miente" was later included on" → "The song was later included on"
"on his debut studio album" → "for his debut studio album" to be less repetitive
"and was produced by" → "and produced by"
"at number 23 and nine on" → "at numbers 23 and 9 on" per MOS:NUM
"and playing billards" → "and playing billiards" but move this sentence to being the one after the award
"was a recipient of the" → "received the" to avoid repetitive wording with the lead

Charts

Good

References

Lack of copyvio score due to most of the sources not being online articles
Wikilink AllMusic on ref 1
Remove wikilink on AllMusic for ref 2
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 7
Shouldn't ref 9 say Hearst Communications for consistency? Either way, pipe to the article of the same name.
WP:OVERLINK of Houston Chronicle and Hearst Communications on ref 12
Pipe The McClatchy Company to McClatchy on ref 21
Pipe RMM Records to RMM Records & Video on ref 24

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a quick review... I will be able to check back post-work on the coming days! --K. Peake 08:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake: Done, this was easier than I thought it would be and my appointment for the Pfizer shot doesn't come until 12:30 PM EST and the Universal trip has been pushed to tomorrow. Erick (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude Nice to see a quicker response than expected, but there are still a number of issues that haven't been fixed. The word "studios" is still being used for the first one listed in the infobox, you forgot to end the pipe to pop music, power ballad should be wikilinked to itself per MOS, you need to change nine to 9 per MOS, the cover info all belongs before the song's reception per the title of promotion and reception. Once these are all fixed, I will be happy to pass the article! --K. Peake 15:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, Oh yeah I think I got those in the lead. If I don't respond today, it's because of the vaccine's side effects. Erick (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the lead does look better... the power ballad and nine issues exist in the body too, just for a reminder. --K. Peake 17:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, Got it! Erick (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This definitely looks better; all that needs to be done now is move the info for the cover version to all being before the original's reception, rather than only part of it being there. --K. Peake 17:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, I moved the commercial info from the cover version, but I'll be honest, I don't feel strongly about this structure. It's not something I've done for my other GAs in the past. Erick (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude ✓ Pass, I did a bit of copyediting by moving the info for the cover to earlier than the reception of the original apart from the chart positions, as that would not make sense with those being before the positions of the original. --K. Peake 06:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]