Talk:Midhat Mursi

Military history: Biography / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

If it is confirmed that he was in fact killed, I will begin changing the language in the article to past tense, but I think it's too early right now. --Vagodin 04:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

top bomb maker? What it is important to remember...

I believe this is just an allegation -- has anyone offered any proof?

A PBS documentary on precision munitions and electronic warfare in Iraq said that American forces were authorized to launch attacks that would kill up to 30 civilians if they thought they might kill a senior member of Saddam's leadership. The documentary said they launched fifty attacks that they thought might decapitate Saddam's leadership. All of these attacks with precision weapons succeeded, in that they hit the buildings they were aimed at. All of these attacks were failures, in that they failed to hit a single member of the leadership. The PBS documentary didn't say how many civilians died in these amateurish decapitation attacks. But I counted a couple of dozen in the four attempts that I found reference to in the news.

This attack sounds like a similar decapitation attempts, where the American high command calculated that it was worth launching the attack, knowing it would kill innocent civilians, in the hope it might kill Zawahiri. When it failed to kill Zawahiri there would be great pressure to produce a consolation prize to divert attention from the deaths of the 18 civilians.

Trained Richard Reid and Z Moussai?

Midhat Mursi has the nickname Abu Khatab Al Masri -- Abu al Masri. On the 18th CNN's Wolf Blitzer kept referring to him as "Abu Al Masri". Well, the other infamous Abu Hamza al-Masri, the former iman of the Finsbury Park Mosque, also known as "Abu al-Masri", is also alleged to have been a mentor to Richard Reid and Moussai.

The photo

Compare the photo on the blog site, and compare it with photos of the iman of the Finsbury mosque. I strongly suspect that the photo being identified as Midhat Mursi is actually a photo of the Abu Hamza al-Masri. It would be typical of the competence of US intelligence, so far, to have made this kind of mistake. Remember how much confusion there was when Zarqari first rose to prominence when Nick Berg was killed? The US had been telling everyone Zarqari had a prosthetic leg -- inconsistent with the ability of the guy believed to be him to wrestle poor Berg to the ground.

And if you read some of the Combatant Status Review Tribunal dossiers made public through FOIA, you will find instance after instance of name confusion. You will find many instances of guys who were told they would continue to be held in Guantanamo because someone found their name on a hard drive that was believed to have belonged to someone in Al Qaeda. In the heartbreaking transcript of Abdullah Kamel Abdullah Kamel Al Kandari's CSRT he begged the Tribunal to tell him what name had been found on this hard drive. He explained he was a sports hero, a member of the Kuwaiti volleyball team. As a sports hero he had many nicknames. He suggested that if his name was found on an al Qaeda member's hard drive it may have been there simply because the owner was a sports fan. A distressing fact that he wouldn't have learned was that the documents in his dossier transcribe his name six, count 'em six, different ways. You'd think that if you were going to suspend a suspect's human rights based on the claim that you found his name on a suspect's hard drive, you'd make sure that was really his name -- and you would make sure you spelled his name the same way every time you used it.

My point being skepticism is in order that the US intelligence correctly identified this guy. And we shouldn't repeat any of their claims as if they were true -- without any evidence. -- Geo Swan 00:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This event is still unfolding and I will be following it closely, but what you have to remember is that you and I are in no position to overturn new reports, U.S. intelligence or Pakistani intelligence. All we have is pure speculation. I do agree, however, that liberal usage of words such as "allegedly", "reportedly, and "possibly" are in order. Best regards. --Vagodin 02:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "overturning" US or Pakistani reports. If we exercise the neutrality not to accept their unsubstantiated reports there is nothing to overturn. -- Geo Swan 03:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agreed with your addition of the word "alleged", but other than that I feel that the article is neutral. As for the "overturning" question, I was thinking that you were suggesting that we automatically dismiss the reports because of past U.S. intelligence failures. I see now that I probably misunderstood you. --Vagodin 04:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I did go ahead and change some more of the wording. --Vagodin 04:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I called it first

I voiced my suspicion that the photo circulated as Midhat Mursi's was actually Abu Hamza al-Masri before the CIA acknowledged it. -- Geo Swan 20:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now dead

According to the BBC he is now dead from a missile strike. Perhaps someone collected on that $5m reward.. --EvilMonkeySlayer (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added that earlier. But I'm kinda reluctant to write that he's definitely dead, yet. Especially given what happened last time. Probably we should wait for some statement from the US government/change to that rewards website.--Fangz (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Midhat Mursi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]